[4]    Apostol, T. M., Mnatsakanian, M. A., Finding centroids the easy way, Math. Horizons, 8 (2000), 7–12.
[5]    Bender, P., Schreiber, A., Operative Genese der Geometrie, Hölder-Pichler-Temsky, Vienna, 1985.
[6]    Blum, W., ed., Anwendungen und Modellbildung im Mathematikunterricht. Beiträge aus dem ISTRON-Wettbewerb, Franzbecker, Hildesheim, 1993.

[7]    Bogomolny, A., Pythagorean theorem from the intersecting chords theorem (2015), available at http://www.cut-the-knot.org/pythagoras/proof79.shtml.
[8]    Borwein, J., Borwein, P., Girgensohn, R., Parnes, S., Experimental mathematics: a discussion (1996), available at http://www.cecm.sfu.ca/organics/vault/expmath/expmath/ html/expmath.html.
[9]    Castelnuovo, E., Objekt und Aktion im Unterricht in anschaulicher Geometrie, in Zur Didaktik des Mathematikunterrichts, C. Gattegno, ed., Band 2, Schroedel Verlag, Hannover, 1971, 36–53.
[10]    De Villiers, M., An alternative approach to proof in dynamic geometry, Micromath, 11 (1995), 14– 19.
[11]    Dreyfus, T., Hadas, N., Proof as answer to the question why, Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathe-matik, 28 (1996), 1–5.
[12]    Dörfler, W., Fischer, R., Vorträge des 2, Internationalen Symposiums für Didaktik der Mathematik vom 26.9 bis 29.9.1978 in Klagenfurt, Vienna, Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, 1979.
[13]    Erdogan, F., Approximate solution of system of integral equations, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 17 (1969),
6.
[14]    Erdogan, F., Gupta, G. D., Cook, T. S., Numerical solution of integral equations, in Methods of Analysis and Solutions of Crack Problems, Mechanics of Fracture 1, G. C. Sih, ed., Noordhoff, Leyden, 1973, 368–425.
[15]    Faal, R. T., Fariborz, S. J., Daghyani, H. R., Antiplane Deformation of Orthotropic Strips with Multiple Defects, J. Mech. Mater. Struct., 1 (2006), 1097–1114.
[16]    Freudenthal, H., Mathematics as an Educational Task, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1973.
[17]    Freudenthal, H., Didactical Phenomenology of Mathematical Structures, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1983.
[18]    Greer, B., Solving the pentagon problem, J. Math. Psych., 15 (1996), 151–154.
[19]    Hanna, G., Jahnke, H., Proof and application, Educ. Stud. Math., 24 (1993), 421–438.
[20]    Hanna, G., Some pedagogical aspects of proof, Interchange, 21 (1996), 6–13.
[21]    Hanna, G., Jahnke, H., DeBruyn, Y., Lomas, D., Teaching mathematical proofs that rely on ideas from physics, Can. J. Sci. Math. Tech. Educ., 1 (2001), 183–192.
[22]    Hanna, G., Jahnke, H., Proof and proving, in International Handbook of Mathematics Education, A. Bishop, et al., eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1996, 877–908.
[23]    Hanna, G., Jahnke, H., Arguments from physics in mathematical proofs: An educational perspective, For Learn. Math., 22 (2002), 38–45.
[24]    Jaffe, A., Quinn, F., Theoretical mathematics: toward a cultural synthesis of mathematics and theoretical physics, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 29 (1993), 1–13.
[25]    Jaffe, A., Proof and the evolution of mathematics, Synthese, 3 (1997), 133–146.
[26]    Jahnke, H., Zum Verhältnis von Wissensentwicklung und Begründung in der Mathematik-Beweisen als didaktisches Problem, Materialien und Studien des IDM, Band 10, Bielefeld, IDM, 1978.
[27]    Kogan, B., The Application of Mechanics to Geometry, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1974.
[28]    Levi, M., The Mathematical Mechanics: Using Physical Reasoning to Solve Problems, Princeton University Press, 2023.
[29]    Mariotti, M., Introducing pupils to proof: a teaching experiment, in Justifying and Proving in School Mathematics, C. Hayles, L. Healy, eds., Institute of Education, London, 1995, 174–189.
[30]    Mason, J., Questions about geometry, in Teaching and Learning School Mathematics, D. Pimm, E. Love, eds., Hodder and Stoughton, London, 1991, 77–90.
[31]    Monna, A., Dirichlet’s Principle: A Mathematical Comedy of Errors and its Influence on the Development of Analysis, Oosthoek, Scheltema and Holkema, Utrecht, 1975.

[32]    Niss, M., Blum, W., Huntley, I., Teaching of Mathematical Modelling and Applications, Ellis Horwood, New York, NY, 1991.
[33]    OECD, Proceedings of the Second Conference of the OECD Project: Future Perspectives of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education in OECD Countries, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, 1991.
[34]    Oliver, J., Pythagoras theorem: An alternative to note 79.57, Math. Gaz., 81 (1997), 117–118.
[35]    Polya, G., Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning, vol. I: Induction and Analogy in Mathematics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1954.
[36]    Rota, G.-C., The phenomenology of mathematical proof, Synthese, 3 (1997), 183–197.
[37]    Struve, H., Grundlagen einer Geometriedidaktik, Bibliographisches Institut, Marmheim, 1990.
[38]    Streefland, L., Fractions in Realistic Mathematics Education: A Paradigm of Developmental Research (R. Rainero et al., trans.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1991.
[39]    Thurston, W., On proof and progress in mathematics, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 30 (1994), 161–177.
[40]    Tokieda, T., Mechanical ideas in geometry, Amer. Math. Monthly, 105 (1998), 697–703.
[41]    Treeby, D., A physical proof of the Pythagorean theorem, Phys. Teach., 55 (2017), 92.
[42]    Uspenskii, V., Some Applications of Mechanics to Mathematics, Balisdell Publishing Company, New York, NY, 1961.
[43]    Winter, H., Geometrie vom Hebelgesetz aus-ein Beitrag zur Integration von Physik-und Mathe-matikunterricht der Sekundarstufe I, Der Mathematikunterricht, 24 (1978), 88–125.
[44]    Winter, H., Zur Problematik des Beweisbedürfnisses, J. Math.-Didaktik, 1 (1983), 59–95.
[45]    Wittmann, E., Müller, G., Wann ist ein Beweis ein Beweis?, in Mathematik-Didaktik, Theorie und Praxis; Festschrift für Heinrich Winter, P. Bender, ed., Berlin, Cornelsen, 1988, 237–257.